North Korea

UNSC plans more sanctions as North Korea tests nuke

UNITED NATIONS/Seoul – The UN Security Council agreed on Wednesday to prepare further unspecified measures against North Korea after it carried out a fourth nuclear test.
The 15-member council including China, Pyongyang’s ally, “strongly condemned” the test and described it as a “clear threat to international peace and security.”
Uruguay’s Ambassador Elbio Rosselli, this month’s council president, recalled that the council had threatened to take “further significant measures” if Pyongyang violated UN resolutions by testing an atomic device.
“In line with this commitment and the gravity of this violation, the members of the Security Council will begin to work immediately on such measures in a new Security Council resolution,” said Rosselli.
The envoy did not specify whether the new measure would extend sanctions against North Korea, but other diplomats confirmed that adding new names to the sanctions list was being considered.
North Korea said it had carried out a “successful” miniaturised hydrogen bomb test — a shock announcement that, if confirmed, would massively raise the stakes in the hermit state’s bid to strengthen its nuclear arsenal.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the underground nuclear test “deeply troubling” and “profoundly destabilizing for regional security.” He stressed that it was in violation of numerous Security Council resolutions barring Pyongyang from engaging in nuclear activities.
Three previous tests in 2006, 2009 and 2013 triggered waves of UN sanctions.
Currently there are a total of 20 entities and 12 individuals on the UN sanctions blacklist.
British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft said his delegation was “working with others on a resolution on further sanctions.”
The Korean announcement triggered swift international condemnation but also scepticism, with experts suggesting the apparent yield was far too low for a thermonuclear device.
“The republic’s first hydrogen bomb test has been successfully performed at 10:00 am (0130 GMT),” North Korean state television announced.
“We have now joined the rank of advanced nuclear states,” it said, adding that the test was of a miniaturised device.
The television showed North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un’s signed order – dated December 15 – to go ahead with the test, with a handwritten exhortation to begin 2016 with the “thrilling sound of the first hydrogen bomb explosion”.
South Korean President Park Geun-Hye condemned what she described as a “grave provocation”.
The North’s main ally China voiced its strong opposition, while the White House rejected North Korea’s claim of having successfully tested a hydrogen bomb for the first time. “The initial analysis is not consistent with North Korea’s claims” of a successful hydrogen bomb test, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
A hydrogen, or thermonuclear, bomb uses fusion in a chain reaction that results in a far more powerful explosion than the fission blast generated by uranium or plutonium alone.
Last month Kim suggested Pyongyang had already developed such a device.
That claim was questioned by international experts at the time and there was continued scepticism over Wednesday’s test announcement, which took the international community by surprise.
“The seismic data that’s been received indicates that the explosion is probably significantly below what one would expect from an H-bomb test,” said Australian nuclear policy and arms control specialist Crispin Rovere.
The test, which came just two days before Kim Jong-Un’s birthday, was initially detected as a 5.1-magnitude tremor at the North’s main Punggye-ri nuclear test site in the northeast of the country.
The weapons yield was initially estimated at between six and nine kilotons – similar to the North’s last nuclear test in 2013.
The first US hydrogen bomb test in 1952 had a yield of 10 megatons.
Bruce Bennett, a senior defence analyst with the Rand Corporation, said if it was an H-bomb that was tested, then the detonation clearly failed -”If it were a real H-bomb, the Richter scale reading should have been about a hundred times more powerful,” Bennett told AFP.
South Korea’s defence ministry also told reporters it doubted Wednesday’s explosion was thermonuclear in nature.
There were expressions of concern but no public panic on the streets of Seoul, where people have become largely inured to North Korea’s provocations over the years.
Most experts had assumed Pyongyang was years from developing a hydrogen bomb, while assessments were divided on how far it had gone in developing a miniaturised warhead to fit on a ballistic missile.
Whatever the nature of the device, it was North Korea’s fourth nuclear test and marked a striking act of defiance in the face of warnings from enemies and allies alike that Pyongyang would pay a steep price for moving forward with its nuclear weapons programme.
The North’s official news agency was unrepentant.
US “imperialists” had escalated the situation on the Korean peninsula to the brink of war, defying the North’s calls for a peace treaty, it said.
“The more frantic the hostile forces get in their moves to isolate and stifle the DPRK (North Korea), the stronger its nuclear deterrent will grow, bringing them to deathbed repentance.”
The detonation throws down a particular challenge to US President Barack Obama, who, during a visit to South Korea in 2014, vowed sanctions with “more bite” if Pyongyang went ahead with another test.
The final response of China, North Korea’s economic and diplomatic patron, will be key. Beijing has restrained US-led allies from stronger action against Pyongyang in the past, but has shown increasing frustration with Pyongyang’s refusal to suspend testing.
In an initial reaction the foreign ministry in Beijing said it “firmly opposes” the nuclear test, which was carried out “irrespective of the international community’s opposition”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>